|
>>
|
No. 19220
>>19110
Not same poster, just pointing out that>>19040
was referring to >>18428
and the response >>18443
18428 was not referring to Maladolescenza. 18443 assumed it was, which is what 19040 said looked silly, which it did. While I certainly agree that he did a fine enough job refuting the whole sex with uncle thing, etc. His point was that he shouldn't include 18428 in his "Mythbusting" because he was talking about a completely different movie. SO why call him dumbass when he made a perfectly legitimate point? I know, you didn't get what he was saying, so I thought I would clarify for you. Peace
|